Coronavirus / Covid-19 The Biggest Fraud of Our Time

It's very simply explained without the need to be a virology expert. There are practices and procedures for identifying viruses, simply put these have not been followed for covid-19, at least no proof exists and for some reason no one is willing to prove it. What that means is that it is impossible to demonstrate that Covid-19 exists. (This would make creating a vaccine quite a challenge...)

I've searched the WHO website among others trying desperately to find any lab related evidence that Covid-19 exists - no evidence to see. Why would this be so difficult to find? Because Covid-19 has not been proven to exist.

A Canadian named Christine Massey has reportedly filed multiple FOIA requests with the CDC, requesting the following via the Freedom of Information Act:

All studies and/or reports in the possession, custody or control of the CDC and/or the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) describing the purification of any “COVID-19″ virus (including B.1.1.7”, “B.1.351”, “P.1” and any other “variant”) (via maceration, filtration and use of an ultracentrifuge; also referred to at times by some people as “isolation”), directly from a sample taken from a diseased human, where the patient sample was not first combined with any other source of genetic material (i.e. monkey kidney cells aka Vero cells; fetal bovine serum).

In a response letter dated June 7th, 2021, the CDC responded:

The FOIA request is identified as #21-01075-FOIA.

The CDC has never isolated and purified any covid-19 virus.

Source: andrewkaufmanmd.com

Isolation: The action of isolating; the fact or condition of being isolated or standing alone; separation from other things or persons; solitariness. - Oxford English Dictionary

The controversy over whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus has ever been isolated or purified continues. However, using the above definition, common sense, the laws of logic and the dictates of science, any unbiased person must come to the conclusion that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated or purified. As a result, no confirmation of the virus’ existence can be found. The logical, common sense, and scientific consequences of this fact are:

• the structure and composition of something not shown to exist can’t be known, including the presence, structure, and function of any hypothetical spike or other proteins;
• the genetic sequence of something that has never been found can’t be known;
• “variants” of something that hasn’t been shown to exist can’t be known;
• it’s impossible to demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called Covid-19.

In as concise terms as possible, here’s the proper way to isolate, characterize and demonstrate a new virus. First, one takes samples (blood, sputum, secretions) from many people (e.g. 500) with symptoms which are unique and specific enough to characterize an illness. Without mixing these samples with ANY tissue or products that also contain genetic material, the virologist macerates, filters and ultracentrifuges i.e. purifies the specimen. This common virology technique, done for decades to isolate bacteriophages[1] and so-called giant viruses in every virology lab, then allows the virologist to demonstrate with electron microscopy thousands of identically sized and shaped particles. These particles are the isolated and purified virus.

These identical particles are then checked for uniformity by physical and/or microscopic techniques. Once the purity is determined, the particles may be further characterized. This would include examining the structure, morphology, and chemical composition of the particles. Next, their genetic makeup is characterized by extracting the genetic material directly from the purified particles and using genetic-sequencing techniques, such as Sanger sequencing, that have also been around for decades. Then one does an analysis to confirm that these uniform particles are exogenous (outside) in origin as a virus is conceptualized to be, and not the normal breakdown products of dead and dying tissues.[2] (As of May 2020, we know that virologists have no way to determine whether the particles they’re seeing are viruses or just normal break-down products of dead and dying tissues.)[3]

1 Isolation, characterization and analysis of bacteriophages from the haloalkaline lake Elmenteita, KenyaJuliah Khayeli Akhwale et al, PLOS One, Published: April 25, 2019. (Sourced) — accessed 2/15/21
2 “Extracellular Vesicles Derived From Apoptotic Cells: An Essential Link Between Death and Regeneration,” Maojiao Li1 et al, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2020 October 2. (Sourced) — accessed 2/15/21
3 “The Role of Extracellular Vesicles as Allies of HIV, HCV and SARS Viruses,” Flavia Giannessi, et al, Viruses, 2020 May

If we have come this far then we have fully isolated, characterized, and genetically sequenced an exogenous virus particle. However, we still have to show it is causally related to a disease. This is carried out by exposing a group of healthy subjects (animals are usually used) to this isolated, purified virus in the manner in which the disease is thought to be transmitted. If the animals get sick with the same disease, as confirmed by clinical and autopsy findings, one has now shown that the virus actually causes a disease. This demonstrates infectivity and transmission of an infectious agent.

None of these steps has even been attempted with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, nor have all these steps been successfully performed for any so-called pathogenic virus. Our research indicates that a single study showing these steps does not exist in the medical literature.

Instead, since 1954, virologists have taken unpurified samples from a relatively few people, often less than ten, with a similar disease. They then minimally process this sample and inoculate this unpurified sample onto tissue culture containing usually four to six other types of material — all of which contain identical genetic material as to what is called a “virus.” The tissue culture is starved and poisoned and naturally disintegrates into many types of particles, some of which contain genetic material. Against all common sense, logic, use of the English language and scientific integrity, this process is called “virus isolation.” This brew containing fragments of genetic material from many sources is then subjected to genetic analysis, which then creates in a computer-simulation process the alleged sequence of the alleged virus, a so called in silico genome. At no time is an actual virus confirmed by electron microscopy. At no time is a genome extracted and sequenced from an actual virus. This is scientific fraud.

The observation that the unpurified specimen — inoculated onto tissue culture along with toxic antibiotics, bovine fetal tissue, amniotic fluid and other tissues — destroys the kidney tissue onto which it is inoculated is given as evidence of the virus’ existence and pathogenicity. This is scientific fraud.

From now on, when anyone gives you a paper that suggests the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated, please check the methods sections. If the researchers used Vero cells or any other culture method, you know that their process was not isolation. You will hear the following excuses for why actual isolation isn’t done:

1. There were not enough virus particles found in samples from patients to analyze.
2. Viruses are intracellular parasites; they can’t be found outside the cell in this manner.

If No. 1 is correct, and we can’t find the virus in the sputum of sick people, then on what evidence do we think the virus is dangerous or even lethal? If No. 2 is correct, then how is the virus spread from person to person? We are told it emerges from the cell to infect others. Then why isn’t it possible to find it?

Finally, questioning these virology techniques and conclusions is not some distraction or divisive issue. Shining the light on this truth is essential to stop this terrible fraud that humanity is confronting. For, as we now know, if the virus has never been isolated, sequenced or shown to cause illness, if the virus is imaginary, then why are we wearing masks, social distancing and putting the whole world into prison?

Finally, if pathogenic viruses don’t exist, then what is going into those injectable devices erroneously called “vaccines,” and what is their purpose? This scientific question is the most urgent and relevant one of our time.

We are correct. The SARS-CoV2 virus does not exist.

We now have apparently different strains of covid-19, the Kent variant, the delta variant etc... Again, this is complete rubbish, what is the delta variant? No one knows because it hasn't been identified, see above, it's been completely fabricated. Are people so naive to believe that the vaccine (created before the variants appeared) also protects the so-called variants despite the fact they obviously had no way of testing it!? Vaccines take years to manufacture and test, it’s beyond the realms of belief that they could have created a working vaccine without having the means to test it. 

To hoax a global event like a pandemic would take some serious planning. The logistics of getting entire nations to follow the same script is beyond imagination... You would think.

Well, it certainly does take some planning, a handful of the wealthy corporations and a joint co-ordination from healthcare providers, governments, and media, and it was called Event 201.

Led by The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Event 201 was held in New York on 18th October 2019, almost 2 months BEFORE the first cases of Covid-19.  Event 201 was a rehearsal for what was to come. 

Everything that follows here is verifiable by visiting the centre for health security website which outline the full details of Event 201.

The Event 201 Scenario (directly from their website)

Event 201 simulates an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen and the disease it causes are modeled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms.

The disease starts in pig farms in Brazil, quietly and slowly at first, but then it starts to spread more rapidly in healthcare settings. When it starts to spread efficiently from person to person in the low-income, densely packed neighborhoods of some of the megacities in South America, the epidemic explodes. It is first exported by air travel to Portugal, the United States, and China and then to many other countries. Although at first some countries are able to control it, it continues to spread and be reintroduced, and eventually no country can maintain control....

What were the chances of this scenario becoming a reality less than 2 months later? 

Bill Gates predicted in a TED talk in 2015 that a pandemic was coming that would kill a lot of people and demolish the world economy. Now here he was 6 weeks before the 'real' thing funding such a simulated scenario involving John Hopkins, The World Economic Forum, the United Nations, Johnson and Johnson, major banks and officials from China and the CDC in the US... John Hopkins would go on to provide the fraudulent covid figures, the World Economic Forum would push 'The Great Reset', the CDC would be at the forefront of covid policy, Johnson and Johnson would provide a vaccine and it would all start a few weeks later in China - what astonishing synchronicity. 

Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security were also contributors to an annual report on 'Global Preparedness for Health Emergancies' published by the Global Preparedness monitoring board in September 2019. The publication, titled "A WORLD AT RISK" repeatedly warns that "High-impact respiratory pathogens, such as an especially deadly strain of influenza, pose particular global risks in the modern age."  View the full publication here. I'm sure it's just another coincidence that the front cover of this September 2019 publication has a picture of what looks remarkably like coronavirus next to a group of people wearing face masks. 

One day we will look back at 2020 and we will remember covid and 'The First Wave' in comparable terms to that of the Jews being led to gas chambers in Nazi concentration camps. 

NHS data shows us that during the height of the “first wave” between April and June 2020 there were 58,005 beds occupied which equated to 62% occupancy. This is 30% down on the same time frame in the previous year. It also shows us that A&E attendance during the height of the first wave was 57% down on the previous year. This ties in perfectly with all the NHS workers I know who said they were twiddling their thumbs while everyone was clapping for them at the same time that people who genuinely needed care were being denied treatment and care home residents were being murdered. So what exactly where we protecting the NHS from? 

Not only was the covid-19 pandemic planned by the elite, but they also murdered people with the drug Midazolam in what they called the 'first wave'.  Thousands of elderly hospital patients were sent to care homes where they could not be given the treatment they needed, could not be visited by friends or family and had blanket DNR orders placed on them without consent or family knowledge. 

"The Government made a series of shockingly irresponsible decisions which abandoned care home residents to die. … The appalling death toll was entirely avoidable – it is a scandal of monumental proportions." - Kate Allen, Director of Amnesty International UK - Click for the full article at amnesty.org 

Matt Hancock was ultimately the man responsible for odering Midazolam to KILL people. A spokesperson from Accord Healthcare, one of five manufacturers of the drug, told The Pharmaceutical Journal that it had to gain regulatory approval to sell French-labelled supplies of midazolam injection to the NHS, after having already sold two years’ worth of stock to UK wholesalers“ at the request of the NHS” in March 2020. This alarmingly ties in perfectly with the so called 'covid first wave'. 

Here’s a quick run-down of some of the evidence: Read more here

• Midazolam is a commonly used drug in palliative care, think of it as diazepam on steroids.
• Midazolam is also a drug that has been used in executions by lethal injection in the USA.
• UK regulators state that you should only receive midazolam in a hospital or doctor’s office that has the equipment that is needed to monitor your heart and lungs and to provide life-saving medical treatment quickly if your breathing slows or stops.
• This is because Midazolam can cause serious or life-threatening breathing problems such as shallow, slowed, or temporarily stopped breathing that may lead to permanent brain injury or death.
• At the start of the alleged Covid-19 pandemic Matt Hancock ordered a two year supply of Midazolam and then went back to France for more.
• This was confirmed in a parliamentary committee meeting which included Hancock, Professor Van Tam, and Tory MP; Dr Luke Evans, who said a “good death” needs three things, one of those things being Midazolam.
• At the same time Hancock and the Government changed the law on the certification of deaths under the guise of the coronavirus act.
• And the law on cremations; removing the need for a confirmatory medical certificate.
• And the law on indemnity for health service activity.
• And the law on visiting loved ones in care homes; which was banned.
• April and May 2020 saw a huge spike in deaths occurring in care homes, many were attributed to Covid-19.
• In late 2020 the Care Quality Commission found 34% of Health and Social Care workers said they had felt pressured to place ‘Do Not Resuscitate’ orders on care home residents without informing the resident or their loved ones.
• An Amnesty report also found the blanket use of DNR orders in Care homes.
• The two-year supply of Midazolam purchased at the beginning of the alleged pandemic was gone by October.
• What happened to all of the Midazolam?

I predicted at the start of lockdowns that immune systems would be affected by isolation and lack of normal physical outside and social interactions, that just seemed logical. But people are also getting sick because of the masks that are made with toxic graphene (which they laughably call a covid19 miracle because it alleges to kill the virus - while poisoning you), despite being branded a covid miracle many countries, including France and Canada, have recently banned, or advised against the use of graphene masks due to health risks.

And the testing kits are just as bad, they contain a swab coated in Ethylene Oxide, check it for yourself it even says it on the packet. At room temperature, ethylene oxide is a flammable colourless gas with a sweet odour. It is used primarily to produce other chemicals, including antifreeze. In smaller amounts, ethylene oxide is used as a pesticide and a sterilizing agent. The ability of ethylene oxide to damage DNA makes it an effective sterilizing agent but also accounts for its cancer-causing activity. Read more at Cancer.gov

Long-term and occupational exposure to ethylene oxide has been linked to cancers, while it is commonly used to sterilise medical equipment it is not safe for prolonged exposure. The cumulative effect on those taking regular tests is extremely concerning. 

But this is nothing compared to the potential damage that can be caused by the 'cure'...

The latest News section now keeps up to date with the latest Covid updates, some older posts can be seen in the old covid links section.

Click here for AAPS Statement on COVID Shots for Children

Also see How many people are the Covid-19 Vaccines killing? A fantastic article by Dr Vernon Coleman loaded with sources.

You can also view my original 2010 articles on vaccination history and the Swine flu pandemic of 2009.

Video: A Final Warning to Humanity from Former Pfizer Chief Scientist Michael Yeadon

James Fallon is an American neuroscientist. He is professor of psychiatry and human behaviour and emeritus professor of anatomy and neurobiology at the University of California. Fallon states in the following video, taken from a 2018 History Channel documentary, "the future of mind control, and the future being right now because these experiments are being done right now, is using gene editing tools" He then goes on to discuss CRISPR as one of these tools, something which can be "injectable" and "change the structure of brain cells" and "turn you into something you wouldn't otherwise be".