Fake News Blues

By Liam, October 2017 

I’ve been running this website for almost ten years, and researching the topics for longer, in that time I feel my knowledge has become reasonable across many subjects but I’ll be the first to admit I’m a specialist of nothing. I cover topics from quantum physics to child abuse and all the other topics of popular conversation. (...That’s a joke).

 

The biggest issue I face in seeming credible to most is my lack of accreditation - perhaps had I chosen one field of interest, completed a course of further education and gained a degree or a recognised qualification then I would be considered a more reliable source of knowledge - someone who obviously knows their stuff?  

Or, if a large corporate entity chose to sponsor my work and promote what I do? Perhaps if it was printed in mainstream newspapers, maybe that would give you the confidence that I’m not just a crazy tin foil hat wearing, paranoid delusional with a house full of dried food and canned goods in preparation for the next apocalypse? 

itsaconspiracy

 I understand these points of view. And unfortunately, the world of conspiracy research would appear to be somewhat full of nutters if you look at some of the things you find on the web, but I say even some of the nutters make a good point now and again - and some of the so-called specialists are clearly way off the mark... 

 

All I ask is that you understand this from me; I am of sound mind, I am not in any way paid, endorsed, sponsored, encouraged or directly influenced externally to do what I do. I believe in the goodness in mankind but I believe in the evilness in mankind... It's not all roses.

 

 

I study things I enjoy and my favourite topics of research over the last 10-12 years are Charles Manson and mind control, as separate subjects, although the two subjects certainly overlap.  Contradictory to mainstream views on Manson however, I do not believe he was a master of mind control – yet this is the reason why he is still incarcerated today for murders the mainstream also accept he did not commit.  As far as I’m aware, correct me if I am wrong, Charles Manson is the only man in history who has been jailed for mind controlling other people to kill for him?  I own a small library of classic and rare books on these two subjects alone yet I wouldn’t claim to be an expert on either subject - I fully appreciate how little I know in the grand scheme of things and my opinions and ideas are always subject to scrutiny in the light of newly discovered information and my views on Manson for example changed drastically over several years of researching.

 

Every opinion is reflective of an individuals perceived knowledge (What we think we know) and experience (what we have seen/done). Therefore, everyone’s opinion is valid under investigation of the truth even though this knowledge and experience may be different to that of our own. In fact, it is for this very reason that differing opinions should be openly discussed; because new information may lead to new opinions on previously accepted truths. We should allow ourselves to be open to alternative information with the confidence that we have the sense and intelligence to come to our own conclusions without being forcefully guided by the judgements and views of others.

Media Overkill! 

 

usmedia-ownershipThe world’s mainstream media is largely responsible for our perceptions on just about everything. In many ways, we set the bar of what is believable by what is told to us on TV or what we read in mainstream papers/magazines and online articles.

Anything that falls outside of the category of ‘mainstream’ falls into the category of ‘questionable’ when it comes to the general opinion on information. 

The issue is while we are right to categorise everything else as ‘questionable’ we are wrongfully believing in all that is mainstream, so what do we do? Question everything.

 

 

uk media chart website

To highlight the issue, in the US mainstream media is owned by a total of just six companies. What this means is that a small group of people, (some of the wealthiest people on the planet) own the entire mainstream media; that’s every paper, every TV and radio station, every publisher and every broadcaster, basically every single source of news that is digested constantly by a public that believes there is a ‘free press’ or that the media are there to inform and enlighten us with the truth. 

 

Read More on US Media Ownership.

 

In the UK you can see by this chart updated 2015 that the media is dominated again by just a handful of companies. 

 

Do you think a small group of the world’s wealthiest people are trustworthy enough not to manipulate the media for their own agenda?

 

 

 

I believe there is a hidden agenda behind almost every news story. Looking at the Charles Manson case again briefly: I firmly believe Manson was an unwitting patsy who found himself in the wrong place at the wrong time and ended up as one of several million other potentials to be used by the CIA and the American Government as a tool to mind control the entire nation – it wasn’t about the murders in the summer of ’69, it was about destroying the counterculture movement (Peace, Love, LSD) and changing the way people were -  forever.  The Manson case had a profound effect on American social behaviour and it is not just myself who says this was a defining moment in Modern American history.  Yes, it can be said, Manson has done some pretty bad things in his time; shot people, cut people, hurt women to name a few. But he never killed anyone, and that’s not his crime anyway, his crime was ‘conspiracy to murder’ whereby, he is said to have mind controlled other people to do the killing for him…

 Please tell me you can see the contradiction in mainstream belief here?

Although mind control is very real and has advanced to a point whereby a person can be programmed to kill, this is not mainstream knowledge and, in general, most people would dismiss a man’s ability to manipulate the minds of others into becoming a killer. For example, many people, myself included, claim Mark David Chapman was mind controlled to assassinate John Lennon, there is an absurd amount of evidence to suggest this may be true and it is certainly possible, yet I look mad when I suggest such a thing -  in the Manson case, it is widely accepted as truth that he used mind control because the mainstream media accept and promote this view.

As I said it’s all about having the mainstream stamp of approval, it is so powerful and this is exactly how the case against Manson was won - Manson’s trial was always doomed, not least because of President Nixon’s media outburst against Manson during the trial declaring “Manson guilty”, this was printed in mainstream papers and seen by the jury, quite simply it should have been a mistrial based on this alone, but the agenda, or conspiracy, that was at play here, required Manson to be sent down and for him to become the new face of evil. 

manson hitler

 

manson rolling stone

 

 

 It was the mainstream view that Manson was, as quoted by some papers at the time, the “illegitimate son of Adolph Hitler”, and "The most dangerous man alive".

 

 

 

 

 

 

manson satan

 The effect this has is substantial, especially when you consider that Manson is still very well known for being the face of evil almost 50 years on from the murders committed by people you’ve probably never heard of; Charles ‘Tex’ Watson, Linda Kasabian, Patricia Krenwinkle and Susan Atkins. Unlike Manson himself, Linda Kasabian was present at both murder scenes and in fact drove the murderers to the scene of both crimes. Despite seemingly to be somewhat more involved in the murders than Manson himself, Linda Kasabian was given immunity from prosecution on the condition that her testimony supported the prosecution’s case against Manson.  Funnily enough she took the deal and walked free, without her testimony the prosecution had no case against Manson and he would have also walked free.

Justice served?

Did you know about any of this?

 

 

If the media don’t want a story printed, it won’t be, the editors ensure stories are filtered before it goes to press, but they don’t fully dictate what will be printed/broadcast, only what will be printed/broadcast within the confines of what they are allowed to print/broadcast.

And even if the story hit every news desk in the country there won’t be any official mainstream outlet that is given authority to use the story and therefore it won’t get the mainstream stamp of approval.  The story is confined to conspiracy theories and rumour, no matter how convincing it is, without that mainstream stamp of approval it will just go on the pile with all the other conspiracies and remain overlooked… that is until, one day, 50-100 years later, when classified documents and information is released proving the nutters who cried conspiracy were right all along… again!

 

The media is just one example of how a few people control the masses, the structure however is the same almost anywhere you look. The education system, for example, can be summed up as follows; the blind leading the blind.

I know how incredibly arrogant many people will think I am saying that, but again I’d ask you to look at another perspective; If what I am saying is correct, the education system would be the most effective way of misguiding people and ‘throwing them off the scent’. 

 

schooling-by-david-dees

 

It is a lockdown on our consciousness that starts building walls around all possibility in the minds of wonderfully imaginative children! I’m not saying discipline isn’t needed in a stable child’s life but School is all about confining a child’s mind within a limited box of possibility, where what is and isn’t possible isn’t discovered, but dictated (often incorrectly).  For a child with potential beyond our imagination this simply shuts down the ability for them to express and be themselves, and as such they conform to the expected standard or find themselves being labelled as disruptive and uncooperative, and are all too often put on drugs because of it, ensuring that free mind gets shut down one way or another.

 

 

 

Our bizarre society believes that if kids don’t conform to education it’s ok to drug them.

School is where a child starts forming bold ideas of the world, nature, existence, spirituality and more, yet none of us as adults can even claim to have definitive answers to some of the most important questions about human existence.

Further education is no different, I’m not saying that what is taught is all wrong, far from it, what I am saying is that we are only learning within the confines of the limited possibilities that are being expressed when we do not fully understand the nature of our own reality and indeed our true potential. 

 

Generally, there are two types of people, those who believe the god theory or those who believe the science theory.  I agree there’s a lot more, err science? to the science theory, but remember why it’s called the big bang theory, or the theory of evolution, there is no irrefutable proof, so it is just a theory, an idea, based on intelligence, biology and physics and numbers and all sorts of clever stuff, but it is still just a theory and it’s only based on what we think we know, not always on the facts, and that’s a very big difference.   

 

200 years ago, we believed the earth was flat and those who suggested it was a sphere were branded crazy, primarily because the extent of our knowledge at the time led us to believe the people on the other side of a sphere would fall off. Now we have identified gravity, our knowledge has shifted and the suggestion that the world is round is a given fact, for most…

This is a great example of how opinions can change drastically.

Isaac Newton discovered gravity and the laws of motion that underpin much of modern physics with 'Newton's law of universal gravitation'. 

In 1935 Einstein and his co-authors claimed to show that quantum mechanics led to logical contradictions. That is simply to say, “it doesn’t make logical sense”. I’m not claiming to be smarter than Einstein here, but, if you look at quantum mechanics through scientists eyes it will contradict what you thought you knew about physics, and therefore seem illogical and “not quite right - as though something’s missing” as Einstein himself said. Quantum physics has been confusing scientists such as Einstein ever since.

Science talks about the laws of physics, as if they are fixed and set in stone, however they are not, it is only our understanding of them that is set in stone, therefore what doesn’t fall within these parameters becomes ‘unexplainable’ in scientific terms. 

For example, there is a scientific paradox known as the Quantum Zeno effect, which was first discovered by scientists observing the radioactive decay of Uranium. Uranium is known to be unstable and to decay over time. When tests were performed unobserved the uranium decayed as expected, but, when scientists attempted to observe the process, unexplainably, they found the uranium particles would not decay.

Multiple studies now illustrate how measuring particles with increased frequency will affect the rate of decay — potentially suppressing it completely - in effect allowing the observer to stop time. We cannot explain scientifically why this is. But it is a remarkable discovery and one that absolutely challenges the nature of our own reality as quantum physics does time and time again.  More on The Quantum Zeno effect here.

 

So, I do dismiss mainstream education, media, science, religion and other institutions that claim to be the be all and end all of information and truth. But I do not dismiss them as important and indeed essential to understanding the truth behind this limited version of reality that we currently experience.

The trouble appears to be that we are all suffering from a mild to extreme case of cognitive dissonance, myself included to some degree, whereby we hold opinions and beliefs that are so strong, even undeniable evidence would struggle to change them.  The greatest examples of this in our society would be religion and Science. 

 

So, we have God theory which believes God made the universe, the religion is rigidly fixed, it is unquestionably right and does not consider alternative religious or science theory because it would interfere with the integrity of God theory.

Then, we have Science theory which believes in the big bang theory, Darwin’s theory of evolution from ape to man etc., it is unquestionably right because no scientific proof can contradict it, and does not consider God theory because it would interfere with the integrity of Science theory.

Then you have conspiracy theory which regularly considers science theory and God theory among all possibilities to obtain answers/raise questions.  And, simply put, conspiracy theory is the suggestion that a group of two or more people are secretly planning to do something unlawful or harmful. 

By that definition you’d have to agree conspiracies are occurring and ongoing daily worldwide, that much is undeniable.  What is questionable is the depth to which they extend and the effect this has on us individually and collectively. 

 

For me personally, it is difficult to watch the news on TV, listen to the radio, read the newspapers and digest the mainstream drivel that is churned out daily on social media, most simply because I believe that it is either a) false or b) manipulated to fit an agenda.

 

I’m not exaggerating when I say that nearly all mainstream news is false or manipulated (see also: False Flags article). Remember, six companies are in control of all of this in the US alone and a handful in the UK. These billionaires can make or break a single person or an entire country overnight just by printing stories, true or false. The have an unlimited amount of global control way beyond the level of Presidents and Prime ministers.

There is always a story within a story, as with Charles Manson, as earlier mentioned, more recently we have had an awful mass shooting in Las Vegas. The official story is that a lone nut job took it upon himself to carry out this horrific killing spree and among various other things the media is claiming this one man, conveniently also dead after shooting himself, “acted alone” and “fired a range of automatic weapons from high up on the 32nd floor of the Hotel”. 

Without going into detail lets pull that theory apart:

  • Video evidence (See here) clearly shows shots were being fired from a much lower level of the hotel far away from where Paddock was said to be shooting from,
  • video evidence also strongly suggests that there were multiple weapons being fired at times simultaneously from more than one location. 
  • There is no CCTV evidence of Steven Paddock entering the hotel or transporting what the papers are reporting as between 20-30 automatic weapons to his hotel room.
  • People in the crowd reported of being warned upto 45 minutes before the shooting that they were "all going to die" (see here)

 

Conveniently the media bundled into their report that ISIS claimed responsibility stating Paddock converted to IS 'recently'.

This of course, all came as a shock to all of his friends, family and girlfriend, who have stated they had no idea about his radical beliefs and intentions.

It is highly unlikely that Paddock could have committed this crime alone, if at all.  I think people are slightly ignorant to exactly how much time, planning, money and not to mention physical effort this would have taken, especially considering he was an untrained 64-year-old man with not so much as a criminal record and apparently, no motive whatsoever.  Not impossible, but improbably and from the little evidence I've seen, the reports don't match clear facts and that is enough to highlight a 'conspiracy'. 

Unfortunately, I do not know the absolute truth as to what happened in Las Vegas, it is too early to say with any degree of certainty, it is clear, however, that the media are misreporting the truth yet again. 

As is usually the case over the coming weeks and months enough information will have emerged to build the bigger picture of what really happened, the problem is that by the time the truth has emerged it’s all but forgotten about, and the only memories of what happened are the headlines and images that were pumped into our psyche when the news hit the media.  And of course, you won’t read about the new information that contradicts the mainstream view in the mainstream media.  

What is obvious to me about this story is the real story within; the American Government want to disarm its citizens. 

A perfect world would have no guns or weapons or killing machines and of course it sounds like a good idea to take guns away from certain individuals or at least to make them harder to obtain through more rigorous checks etc., but then on the other hand you have Donald Trump as the leader of ‘the free world’ who has the authority to dictate who can and who can’t own a gun, is that better? Personally, if Trump (or Clinton) was running my country, I think I would want a gun for safety too. 

If America had decided at any time prior to now to change gun laws there would have been uproar and revolt causing chaos and instability that could have potentially over turned the political/economical structure of the US which is dictated by elite private bankers and corrupt media, not presidents and congress. 

It has been a long-term plan to disarm American citizens, I’d say the plan has been running since about 1776.  What we forget is that America has a constitution stating they have the right to bear arms and this was enshrined in their constitution for the protection of its citizens against corrupt governments based on experiences of the past. If the government had tried to overturn gun laws the citizens would have overturned the government – see 1776 - America fought for independence from Britain because of the way they were being unfairly governed and taxed.

 

Of course, this shooting is no isolated incident, America has had several similar incidents in recent years, but then again, you look at the list of other mass shootings and take some time to independently scrutinise the events that have been portrayed in the media against the evidence that now exists for and against these cases and wow, none of it is convincing at all… The Orlando shooting at Pulse nightclub, Sandy Hook, Batman shootings at Aurora, now Las Vegas… The mainstream media will never tell you the truth.  The truth is that real events like this, where a person commits mass murder of his or her own free will, is extremely rare. I do not believe irresponsible gun ownership is the cause of these events.

 

It may be worth reminding people here that German citizens were disarmed by their government in the late 1930s which inevitably allowed the Nazis to carry out their evil intentions with relatively little resistance.

 

With over 800 FEMA concentration camps and more appearing all over America, many staffed and ready to take prisoners with what appear to be mass burial sites stocked with stack upon stack of plastic coffins the parallels to 1930’s Nazi Germany are frightening. More on FEMA camps

 

I know I’m fighting a tough one here, I do see the points of view from both sides, however it can only work to disarm America if the citizens have faith in its government and let’s face it, not many countries right now can claim to have faith in their government - The divide in America between Trump/Clinton, in the UK with May unable to secure a majority, and the same now in Germany with Merkel and of course the events ongoing in Catalonia and across Europe and beyond, the majority of people do not have faith in their government and this is demonstrated by all the recent elections, many of which have resulted in riots, violence, civil unrest and created political divides like never before.  

Governments are, almost by definition now, untrustworthy. The problem, as I have stated already, is that Governments are not run by the people for the people - they are run by the elite establishment, the private bankers, the media moguls, the 1 %, and they control the news, wealth, health, law and policies that we think we can influence in our so called democratic societies.

 

brexitaeticle

Voting for May or Corbyn or Clinton or Trump, it doesn’t matter, if you’re voting you’re confirming you believe there’s a point to it all and that your vote counts, if you think that, they (the elite establishment) have got you under their control…  I published an article that was sourced from the telegraph online the day before the declaration of the Brexit referendum in Britain last year, I published it because it was written as if it was all over and the results were in, although they weren't yet declared!

The article even went on to correctly predict the results of the vote, 52/48 in favour of leave.

The article quickly disappeared from the internet, although fortunately I did get this screen shot, (notice the date stamp, this is on my facebook) -  the following day everything in the article came true as if it were some kind of prophecy. 

But of course, it’s far simpler than that, there was no looking into future or any great magic involved, simply a script which is being meticulously followed. 

 

 

Brexit was always going to be 52/48 leave, I published that article before the voting had finished, your vote meant nothing. 

 

These little mistakes and jumping ahead of script happen quite often, remember World trade Centre building 7? CNN and BBC both reported on live television that this building had collapsed 20 minutes before it did, one of the reporters tells viewers the building has collapsed and yet you can see the building still standing in the live footage being broadcast. (Read more) At the time people don’t always pick up on the clues because you’re consumed with the terror and the shock and the emotion of what is happening, but when you can go back and reassess these events with a clearer mind and start questioning anomalies you see far too many of them without reasonable answers and the official version of events falls apart. 

 

It is becoming increasingly harder to get your opinion heard. Sole corporations have taken over entire industries allowing them to dominate and control the information you see and share - You don’t look something up on the internet anymore, you ‘google’ it. And no one has a Myspace page or joins friends reunited anymore, they go on Facebook and twitter. 

Social media has been a great way for people to share new information and to continually allow us expression of ourselves through our individual thoughts and opinions. However, that has all been changing and I have seen a dramatic drop off in the number of visitors to my website in the last 6 months or so. That is because now, if your opinion doesn’t fall into the category of mainstream, another global corporation, innocent old Facebook, can simply brand you as a hoax by marking a story as “disputed”. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said in December 2016 the company would make it easier for people to report hoaxes, and would send suspected stories to a third-party group of fact-checkers who would mark a story as “disputed” if they conclude the story is a hoax. The company added disputed posts would be accompanied by “related articles” that would offer fact-based alternatives for users to read.

Freedom-of-Speech-freedom-of-speech-19188413-510-352

 

 

Simply put, Facebook will select a chosen third party who will work to parameters of fact checking set by Facebook themselves, allowing the company to deem any story as disputed, and to offer its own version of the truth as an alternative. 

 

It all sounds well and good if for one moment you thought Facebook was not just another giant wheel in the corrupt corporate world that I’ve been discussing...

 

 

But, I’m assuming you haven’t gotten all this way through the article if you believe that?

 

Don't forget to Like me on facebook! 

web analytics