False Flag Attacks

“The very word ‘secrecy’ is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it.

And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. . . .

For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumour is printed, no secret is revealed.” 

J F Kennedy

‘False-Flag’ events have become a common occurrence in modern times, in fact they are so common now that almost all mainstream news articles are now in danger of falling into the category of false flag. They have become an integral means of shaping the world around us, by manipulating our perception of the truth through false or misleading propaganda.

Following the tragic recent events in Manchester, where 22 people are now confirmed to have died in yet another ‘terrorist attack’ by the so called ‘Islamic State’ or ‘IS’ militant group, and even while writing this article another attack in London has killed seven and injured dozens more, it seems necessary to remind people of how we have been deceived time and time again by false flag events.

A false flag operation could be described as when an act of aggression, for example a terrorist attack, is used, deliberately and against its own people, by an organisation such as government/military/intelligence. The aim of such an operation is to change public perception and/or engineer a desired public reaction. This could be for political gain, such as support for political action that would previously have been deemed unacceptable, for example placing restrictions on basic freedoms, this of course would be done under the guise of ‘national security’. It doesn’t have to be an act of aggression or war, but this is the most common and the most sinister kind of tactic used in a false flag. Sometimes the enemy can be real, as some examples will demonstrate, other times the enemy is entirely fabricated or a scape goat is used, but it is the situations themselves that are often engineered or allowed to happen for a desired effect.

This technique is often referred to as Problem – Reaction – Solution:

False flags are required to escalate a Problem, the public Reaction is that of “something must be done…” and the Solution is offered by the same entities creating the problem, manipulating the public to not only accept the changes that follow but to demand them, in turn giving them exactly what they wanted – and this is usually more restrictions on our freedom.

False flag attacks throughout history have been the catalyst to many significant world-changing events, including but not limited to the starting of world wars and genocides, and are directly and indirectly responsible for the countless deaths of now millions of innocent victims across the globe. False flag events follow both the Problem, reaction, solution pattern and, usually hand in hand, the totalitarian tip-toe – where a sequence of events leads to a gradual changing of perception from the general public allowing the cryptocracy to introduce its agenda step by step with our approval.

The sinking of the Lusitania which led to the US entering WW1 was a false flag: On 7th May 1915 the ‘unsinkable’ RMS Lusitania sunk off the southern Irish coast with the loss of 1,195 lives, including 128 Americans. The Lusitania was hit by one single German torpedo. A few moments after the torpedo hit, a second huge explosion took place within the hull and the ship began to founder rapidly. 18 minutes later, the Lusitania disappeared beneath the waves.

Researchers now believe the second explosion was caused by some of the 600 tons of pyroxyline explosive, 6 million rounds of .303 bullets, 1248 cases of shrapnel shells, plus an unknown quantity of munitions that filled the holds on the lower deck. (The British claimed this was a civilian ship, yet it was armed to the rafters, the Germans knew this and even warned that they would open fire). Essentially, the Lusitania was deliberately blown up. The British, in cahoots with the American’s, intentionally murdered as many of their own people as possible, to gain the greatest propaganda value from the German attack.

In its time, the sinking of the Lusitania had all the shock impact of 9/11 and it was the catalyst that bought America into WW1. Before the attack on the Lusitania the American people would not have allowed their government to take them into the war, following the attack, Americans were less resistant and many agreed entering the war was necessary.

Adolph Hitler successfully used false flag tactics in 1933 shortly after being sworn in as The Chancellor of Germany. It is well known among WW2 historians that the burning of the Reichstag building was a pivotal event in the establishment of Nazi Germany. The fire was used as evidence by the Nazi Party that communists were plotting against the German government; however, it is widely believed that the Nazi party themselves organised this event with the knowledge that this would benefit their political agenda such as it did.

Following the blaze Marinus van der Lubbe, a 24 year old pro-Communist Dutch labourer, was beheaded by the Nazis after ‘admitting’ that he started the blaze alone to encourage a workers' uprising. However, it is widely agreed there is no substance to Nazi claims that van der Lubbe or indeed communists were responsible for the fire. It is now widely believed that SA leader, Karl Ernst, ordered Nazi Stormtroopers to enter the Reichstag through a tunnel and start the fire. Ernst is said to have told his men that an excuse was needed to begin attacking Communists.

And that’s exactly what Hitler did as he used the fire to justify the arrest and torture of 25,000 Left-wing activists and to pass an emergency decree establishing absolute Nazi authority (dictatorship). Like with the sinking of the Lusitania, a catalyst was required to win the German Government the support of the population, without such a catalyst Hitler’s dictatorship would have been rejected and history may have taken a very different course.

Pearl Harbour is another case of false flag, as with the sinking of the Lusitania, the attack on Pearl Harbour was allowed to happen and used as an excuse to justify entering a war. On Sunday morning, December 7, 1941, Pearl Harbour was attacked by the Japanese in what history books refer to as a ‘surprise’. 2,403 Americans died and 1,178 were wounded, eighteen ships were sunk or run aground, the impact of the attack on the American psyche was enormous. It was the event that catapulted the US into the second world war.

Despite the myth that the strike force maintained strict radio silence, US Naval intelligence intercepted and translated many dispatches: Tokyo sent over 1000 transmissions to the attack fleet before it reached Hawaii. Many of these dispatches left no doubt that Pearl Harbour was the target of a Japanese attack. Even on the night before the attack, US intelligence decoded a message pointing to Sunday morning as a deadline for Japanese action. The message was delivered to the Washington high command more than four hours before the attack on Pearl Harbour. But, as with other intelligence, it was withheld from the Pearl Harbour commanders - almost as if from the American’s point of view the attack was not only allowed to happen, it was also a case of it had to happen.

The American public had no interest in joining another European battle with WW1 still relatively fresh in the minds of many, but following the attack on Pearl Harbour the entire nation was unanimous in regards to entering the war and an additional 16 million American men and women voluntarily joined the military.

Fast forward 60 years to September 11 2001. (Read my full 9/11 article here) A date ingrained in the minds of those who were alive when it happened. It needs no introduction, in fact if anything it’s been done too many times, but the reason you cannot discuss 9/11 too much is because it is the single most obvious event of a false flag operation ever. The American government orchestrated the hijacking and crashing of passenger airplanes, as well as the demolition of three buildings, including the world trade centres 1 and 2 while people were still inside. This is one of the most devastatingly evil acts to have ever occurred in known history and the bare fact is that it was orchestrated by a government against its own people. 9/11 should have changed the world, but not in the way it did. We have mainstream media to thank for that.

What has followed is the 7/7 bombings, the Brussels attack, the Munich attack, the two separate attacks in London and the attack in Manchester – all false flag. Add to this the ‘faked’ ‘incidents’ that never actually occurred, like the ‘Gulf of Tonkin’ incident used to ‘justify’ the U.S war crimes against Vietnam, the infamous Weapons of Mass Destruction (WOMAD) hoax used to justify two wars and millions of deaths, (including that of 500,000 Iraqi children), and the many faked ‘mass shootings’ like Sandy Hook, The Boston Marathon, The Miami nightclub and the Paris concert shootings to name just a handful, false flags are occurring literally all the time.

The reason we have experienced so many false flag events recently is because another major attack on our freedom is desired by those who oppose us, (the shadow government/cryptocracy/illuminati, whatever you want to call them, let’s just call them the guys who control our leaders).

When an attack such as what we saw in Manchester or London occurs, we as a nation unite with great strength and a determined show of solidarity. This is when you see the good in people and the determined will to defeat the ‘terrorists’ who “hate our democracy”. It is for this very reason that the cryptocracy coordinate false flag attacks: To divide and conquer. If our own leaders conspired to overtly attack us we would revolt. By covertly conspiring to attack us again and again while blaming it on ‘Islamic extremists’, over time they can manipulate us into demanding something must be done and of course they offer the solution that takes them to the next step in their plan, that’s the totalitarian tip-toe - with each step, more of the agenda is played out. In this example, I’m suggesting the Cryptocracy eventually want to have a militarised police force with the power to raid your home, arrest, detain and even relocate your entire family to detention centres without any kind of warrant, completely bypassing the judicial system, (basically Nazi Germany). We already have some idiots who are demanding that this is the next course of action taken following the recent attacks. Dividing our nation toward a culture of fear and hate towards groups from different backgrounds is exactly what they want.

Despite my own disinterest in following any religion, I do believe that all the major religions are practiced by peaceful people who are opposed to war and murder. In fact, none of them advocate the use of violence against others. Of course, it is always inevitable to have a few bad apples in any society whereby someone commits a crime against another, but it is a fabrication that a militant group called ISIS, IS, Muslims, or Islam itself, is responsible for the terrorist attacks we have seen in recent weeks. The individuals being broadcast on the news as terrorists are mere patsies, much like Lee Harvey Oswald was in the murder of JFK or Mark David Chapman in the John Lennon murder: I’m not saying they didn’t commit the crimes, (Although in Oswald’s case he didn’t), but I am saying they were props, deliberately placed and given a whole fabricated background story so that you would believe that these attacks were committed by “radicalised Islamic Jihadis” - as the Sun newspaper puts it. This leads to idiots on social media calling out for the rounding up and imprisonment of groups of Muslims until they prove innocence of not being a terrorist! Hello! Nazi Germany!!! Is this what we want?

The truth behind the headlines, (not to mention the obvious factors such as uniformed military on the streets, armed police officers and increased security checks), is that a major shake-up in internet security is desired. Along with encrypted messaging services and other forms of private, personal communication, the internet itself and free access to its information is genuinely under great threat. I’ve been reporting this for many years now, and there’s been a lot of talk about ‘internet 2’ for several years also, we’ve seen the totalitarian tip-toe stomping towards the eradication of a ‘free’ internet where people can openly post and access information from any source at work for a good 5-7 years. How long before my website, already considered extremist, is completely banned?

Privacy may I remind you did not exist before these recent terrorist events, in todays world almost everything digital relating to you is stored against your name permanently for intelligence services to pry into. That includes your internet history, your personal emails and messages and your personal calls, even what you think are private conversations away from telephones where your smart TV, PC, Laptop, mobile, tablet and other hundreds of other wireless devices continually record video and audio of everything going on. (If you haven’t read George Orwell’s ‘Nineteen-eighty-four’ then it’s highly recommended. Written as fiction in 1948 it eerily describes a society not too dissimilar from the one we live in now. It’s also eerily chilling how Apple based their first ever TV advertisement on Orwell’s classic work when they launched the first Apple Mac in, you guessed it, 1984.)

“The two aims of the party are to conquer the whole surface of the earth and to extinguish once and for all the possibility of independent thought” George Orwell, Nineteen-eighty-four.

I believe there is an agenda against the internet and the many freedoms it gives to those who chose to use it. Despite the fact you cannot trust all of what you find on the internet, it has made a lot of information, much of which would otherwise never have been made public, available to the billions of people who now have online access. The internet has been an integral tool for those waking up to seek truth beyond the mainstream media and the dogma of science and religion. Even if it is not always facts, different opinions get people talking and more importantly thinking. The internet is full of open discussions on ideas of all kinds that would be considered way beyond the mainstream, and some are bonkers for sure, but some hold substance and as they say, the truth is out there, and people are starting to connect the dots because of the information available. It is for this reason that the internet must be changed; The internet poses a real threat to the cryptocracy and their control over the human mind.

As always this is part of a larger ‘conspiracy’ whereby the goal is for humans to be absolutely enslaved through a mundane repetitive cycle of sleep – work – eat repeat.

In so-called ‘advanced’ modern society, such as ours here in the UK, ultimate freedom, such as locking us all away, would not be possible because enough of us would revolt and we would not accept such restrictions on ourselves or others in what we consider a ‘free-society’. Many British people would consider the idea of people in our country being absolutely enslaved as ridiculous, however, consider two things; 1. In our modern world, right now, across the globe there are considerable millions of people who are currently living in horrific conditions with restricted basic freedoms under oppressive regimes; 2. Nazi Germany is very recent history and it involved the unopposed rounding up of groups of people (including millions of Germans) to be placed in concentration camps and worked to death. The German people who allowed this to happen were not evil, they were manipulated into having a perception that was totally warped by their corrupt government who convinced them that this was not only acceptable but necessary for their security and survival. This is what is happening now, in the UK, in America and across the board, it is, as I have said in other articles many times, a global agenda.

I also believe that there is an agenda to change people’s views on the police, perhaps I am being cynical, but consider the attack in Westminister where a Police officer was stabbed to death generating a lot of sympathy and empathy for not just the individual but the role of a police officer in general. I do not mean to sound insensitive when I say that the officer who was killed at Westminister was given a lot of extravagant press coverage and even his funeral was a national event, held at Westminister Abbey, usually reserved for Royalty only. I’m not saying his death wasn’t tragic or sad or wrong, it was all of those, but what other dead police officer has received that level of attention for (dare I say it and face the backlash) doing his job? Surely every police officer is as much a hero, the fact his death was such a spectacle seems to me to be part of the agenda. They needed a police officer to die in such a way to generate a sympathetic response from the population.

Next we have the officer who was caught dancing at the Manchester One Love concert – this has been in the headlines and in my twitter feed every single day since! Sorry to sound cynical once again, but what a set up. This was a complete publicity stunt, required once again to generate a respect and fondness for the Police. The one’s who will eventually, like Hitler’s SS be the one’s who are unquestionably bashing down doors and arresting people on the command of their superiors. Now I’m not attacking the police, they are mostly unaware of their role and the officers on the beat aren’t orchestrating anything, they are just doing their jobs and following orders. I’m just pointing out that the Nazi SS officers were also just following orders and doing their jobs.

Watch this video and see if your opinion of the police changes. Can anyone explain why these police officers are caught on candid film at London Bridge changing out of their police uniforms and into the clothing that is later worn by the ‘dead terrorists’ photographed for the papers?

I can explain it. THE POLICE WERE THE TERRORISTS.

What is necessary, but difficult at first to understand and accept, is the fact that our world leaders do not operate in the way that is portrayed to us through the media - Even the heads of countries at war with each other are often close political allies in terms of the global agenda - it’s all an act and the world is their stage... Money truly makes the world go around (in this five-sense reality at least) and it would be worth reading articles such as the Rothschilds conspiracy to gain an understanding of how almost all wars since the Napoleonic era have been funded by the crooked Rothschild banking cartel.

Contrary to popular belief, it is very beneficial for world leaders to send their countries to war. This would go a long way to explain why Britain has been at war for 99 of the last 100 years and America has been engaged in conflict for over 90% of its entire existence since independence in 1776. Shocking statistics when you consider these are supposed to be peaceful democracies. War is, quite literally, a booming industry, (excuse the pun), and this explains why American troops are right now being killed by international militant groups armed with American weapons - The international weapons intelligence industry is like a global market where the latest weapons are sold to the highest bidders regardless of their political agenda. Money knows no borders when it comes to selling weapons for profit and it’s fair to say the general population agree America and Britain have sold weapons to terrorist groups at home and abroad for many years.

The war on terror is a war that cannot be won. It is a war with no real visible enemy. Its design is to keep populations under control, and to command ever more control.

As George Orwell puts it in his brilliant novel ‘Nineteen-eighty-four’:

“War, it will be seen, is now a purely internal affair. In the Past, the ruling groups of all countries… did fight against one another, and the victor always plundered the vanquished. In our own day they are not fighting against one another at all. The war is waged by each ruling group against its own subjects, and the object of the war is not to make or prevent conquests of territory, but to keep the structure of society intact.

…The ruling groups of all three powers are simultaneously aware and unaware of what they are doing. Their lives are dedicated to world conquest, but they also know it is necessary that the war should continue everlastingly and without victory.

Read more on George Orwell and 1984 in an older article