Genocide: Palestine and the State of Israel - A glance at a bloody History
by Liam Roberts
Raphael Lemkin was a Polish lawyer who emigrated to the United States in 1941. He is best known for his work against genocide, a word he coined in 1943 from the rooted words genos (Greek for family, tribe, or race) and -cide (Latin for killing). He first used the word in print in Axis Rule in Occupied Europe: Laws of Occupation - Analysis of Government - Proposals for Redress (1944), and defined it as "the destruction of a nation or an ethnic group."
After the Holocaust, which had been perpetrated by the Nazi Germany and its allies prior to and during World War II, Lemkin successfully campaigned for the universal acceptance of international laws defining and forbidding genocide.
In 1946, the first session of the United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution that "affirmed" that genocide was a crime under international law, but did not provide a legal definition of the crime. In 1948, the UN General Assembly adopted the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG), which defined the crime of genocide for the first time.
The CPPCG was adopted by the UN General Assembly on 9 December 1948 and came into effect on 12 January 1951 (Resolution 260 (III)). It contains an internationally recognized definition of genocide, which has been incorporated into the national criminal legislation of many countries, and was also adopted by the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which established the International Criminal Court (ICC). Article II of the Convention defines genocide as:
“...any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Genocide is a crime under international law regardless of "whether committed in time of peace or in time of war" (art. I). Thus, irrespective of the context in which it occurs (for example, peace time, internal strife, international armed conflict or whatever the general overall situation) genocide is a punishable international crime.”
Despite the CPPCG being adopted by the UN general assembly and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court we have seen and continue to witness the systematic eradication of Palestine and its people through the creation of Rothschild funded Political Zionism.
A (very) Brief history of Zionism
In 1896, Theodor Herzl, a Jewish journalist living in Austria-Hungary, published Der Judenstaat ("The Jews' State" or "The State of the Jews"), in which he asserted that the only solution to the "Jewish Question" in Europe, including growing antisemitism, was through the establishment of a state for the Jews… Political Zionism had just been born.
A year later, Herzl founded the Zionist Organization, which at its first congress, "called for the establishment of a home for the Jewish people in Palestine secured under public law".
Although initially one of several Jewish political movements offering alternative responses to assimilation and antisemitism, Zionism grew rapidly and became the dominant force in Jewish politics with the destruction of Jewish life in Central and Eastern Europe where these alternative movements were rooted.
“It is essential that the suffering of Jews… becomes worse… this will assist in (the) realization of our plans… I have an excellent idea… I shall induce anti-semites to liquidate Jewish wealth…. The anti-semites will assist us thereby in that they will strengthen the persecution and oppression of Jews. The anti-semites shall be our best friends.” - Theodor Herzl
In 1920, other Zionists voiced similar ideas, including Nahum Goldmann, later president of the World Zionist Organization and World Jewish Congress head. Israel’s first president, Chaim Weizman, said Germany had "too many Jews". In 1921, Jacob Klatzkin called for German Jews to undermine Jewish communities as a way to acquire a future state.
The Ottoman Empire
The Ottoman Empire, also historically referred to as the Turkish Empire or Turkey, was a Sunni Islamic state founded by Oghuz Turks under Osman I in northwestern Anatolia in 1299. With conquests in the 14th and 15th centuries transformed the Ottoman sultanate into an empire.
At the beginning of the 17th century the empire contained 32 provinces and numerous vassal states. With Constantinople as its capital and control of lands around the Mediterranean basin, the Ottoman Empire was at the centre of interactions between the Eastern and Western worlds for six centuries but the empire collapsed and was dissolved in the aftermath of World War I.
By 1914, the Ottoman Empire had been driven out of nearly all of Europe and North Africa. But at that time it still controlled 28 million people, of whom 15.5 million were in modern-day Turkey, 4.5 million in Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, and Jordan, and 2.5 million in Iraq. Another 5.5 million people were under nominal Ottoman rule in the Arabian peninsula.
(Is it another coincidence theory that Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Jordan and Iraq, are all modern day war zones and targets of the west? Of course not and that’s why our Government ensure that we have been at war with countries like Iraq on and off for literally 100 years. One by one each ‘independent’ state is ‘revolutionised’ to bring about a new democratic regime and each time guided by the dirty hand of the West, such as in modern Iraq after we invaded them most recently for the weapons of mass destruction that never existed and were simply the excuse to justify public support for Blair and Boy Bushes many international war crimes against humanity.)
The Ottoman Empire made a formal alliance with Germany signed on 2 August 1914, their alliance with Germany and justification for entering into the conflict was said to be due to strong economic connections with Germany through the Berlin-to-Baghdad railway project.
Two months after Britain's declaration of war on the Ottoman Empire in November 1914, Zionist British cabinet member Herbert Samuel circulated a memorandum entitled The Future of Palestine to his cabinet colleagues. The memorandum stated that "I am assured that the solution of the problem of Palestine which would be much the most welcome to the leaders and supporters of the Zionist movement throughout the world would be the annexation of the country to the British Empire".
When the Ottoman Empire joined the Central Powers in the First World War, it threatened Britain's communications with India via the Suez Canal, besides other strategic interests of the allies. The conquest of Palestine became part of British strategies aimed at establishing a land bridge between the Mediterranean and the Persian Gulf. This would enable rapid deployment of troops to the Gulf, then the forward line of defence for British interests in India, and protect against invasion from the north by Russia. A land bridge was also an alternative to the Suez Canal.
In response to French initiatives, the United Kingdom established the de Bunsen Committee in 1915 to consider the nature of British objectives in Turkey and Asia in the event of a successful conclusion of the war. The committee considered various scenarios and provided guidelines for negotiations with France, Italy, and Russia regarding the partitioning of the Ottoman Empire. The Committee recommended in favour of the creation of a decentralised and federal Ottoman state in Asia.
The British began their Sinai and Palestine Campaign in 1915. The war reached southern Palestine in 1917, progressing to Gaza and around Jerusalem by the end of the year. The British secured Jerusalem in December 1917. They moved into the Jordan valley in 1918 and a campaign by the Entente into northern Palestine led to victory at Megiddo in September of that year.
Victory for the allies in these areas was helped in part by several gross acts of genocide in the Middle East during and continuing after the war.
The Greek Genocide
The Greek genocide, part of which is known as the Pontic genocide, was the systematic ethnic cleansing of the Christian Ottoman Greek population from its historic homeland in Asia Minor, central Anatolia, Pontus, and the former Russian Caucasus province of Kars Oblast during World War I and its aftermath (1914–23). It was instigated by the government of the Ottoman Empire against the Greek population of the Empire and it included massacres, forced deportations involving death marches, summary expulsions, arbitrary execution, and the destruction of Christian Orthodox cultural, historical, and religious monuments.
The Ottoman authorities are accused of having planned and instigated the massacre and 'ethnic cleansing' of the Greeks of Anatolia on the pretext that like the Armenians many Pontic Greeks and Caucasus Greeks had fought in or collaborated with Russian forces on the Caucasus Front of the First World War and then with Britain's ally the Kingdom of Greece, which invaded and occupied a large part of western Anatolia in the 1919-22 Greco-Turkish War - This pretext was used despite the fact that most of the victims of the genocide were clearly innocent civilians, including women and children, and were often from parts of Anatolia where ethnic Greeks had not traditionally had many close links with the Russian Empire or from those that were far removed from the main theatre of the 1919-22 Greek-Turkish War.
Most of the refugees and survivors fled to Greece (amounting to over a quarter of the prior population of Greece),some, especially those in Eastern provinces, took refuge in the neighbouring Russian Empire. Thus by the end of the 1919–22 Greco-Turkish War, most of the Greeks of Asia Minor had fled or been killed with estimates of up to one million deaths. Other ethnic groups were similarly attacked by the Ottoman Empire during this period, including Assyrians (estimated 270,000 – 400,000 deaths) and Armenians (estimated 1 – 1.5 million deaths), many scholars and organizations have recognized these events as part of the same policy of extermination, (Genocide).
The Armenian Genocide
The Armenian genocide was the Ottoman government's systematic extermination of its minority Armenian subjects from their historic homeland within the territory constituting the present-day Republic of Turkey. The starting date is conventionally held to be 24 April 1915, the day Ottoman authorities rounded up and arrested some 250 Armenian intellectuals and community leaders in Constantinople. The genocide was again carried out during and after World War I and implemented in two phases: the wholesale killing of the able-bodied male population through massacre and subjection of army conscripts to forced labour, followed by the deportation of women, children, the elderly and infirm on death marches leading to the Syrian desert. Driven forward by military escorts, the deportees were deprived of food and water and subjected to periodic robbery, rape, and massacre.
The Allies of World War I condemned the Ottoman government-sponsored massacres as crimes against humanity, which of course helps Justify the subsequent division and giving away of land after the collapse of the empire. More recently, the International Association of Genocide Scholars passed a resolution in 2007 affirming that the Ottoman campaign against Christian minorities of the Empire, including the Greeks, was genocide. Some other organisations have also passed resolutions recognising the campaign as genocide, as have the parliaments of Greece, Cyprus, Sweden and 24 other countries.
Establishing The Jewish Home land in Palestine (Israel)
In 1904 Chaim Weizmann, a Chemistry lecturer at the University of Manchester met with Arthur Balfour during one of his electoral campaigns, at the time Balfour was the Conservative MP representing the district and also the Prime Minister.
Chaim Weizmann soon became a leader among British Zionists and an Israeli statesman who served as President of the Zionist Organization twice. In 1910 he became a British citizen, and held his British nationality until 1948, when he renounced it to assume his position as the first President of Israel. Later his nephew Ezer Weizman also became president of Israel, its not what you know...
Balfour supported the concept of a Jewish homeland, but felt that there would be more support among politicians for the then-current offer in Uganda, called the British Uganda Programme. Following mainstream Zionist rejection of that proposal, Weizmann was credited later with persuading Balfour for British support to establish a Jewish homeland in Palestine, the original Zionist aspiration.
In 1917 when Weizmann was serving his second term as president of the Zionist Organisation, Balfour sent a crucial letter to Walter Rothschild which outlined Britain was in favour of a homeland for Jews in Palestine.
The Balfour Declaration
The Balfour Declaration (dated 2 November 1917) was a letter from the United Kingdom's then Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour to Baron Rothschild (Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild), a leader of the British Jewish community, for transmission to the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland.
“His Majesty's government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.”
James Gelvin, a Middle East history professor, cites at least three reasons for why the British government chose to support Zionist aspirations. Issuing the Balfour Declaration would appeal to Woodrow Wilson's two closest advisors, who were avid Zionists.
"The British did not know quite what to make of (US) President Woodrow Wilson and his conviction that the way to end hostilities was for both sides to accept "peace without victory." Two of Wilson's closest advisors, Louis Brandeis and Felix Frankfurter, were avid Zionists. How better to shore up an uncertain ally than by endorsing Zionist aims? The British adopted similar thinking when it came to the Russians, who were in the midst of their revolution. Several of the most prominent revolutionaries, including Leon Trotsky, were of Jewish descent. Why not see if they could be persuaded to keep Russia in the war by appealing to their latent Jewishness and giving them another reason to continue the fight? …These include not only those already mentioned but also Britain's desire to attract Jewish financial resources.”
David Lloyd George, who was Prime Minister at the time of the Balfour Declaration, told the Palestine Royal Commission in 1937 that the Declaration was made "due to propagandist reasons". Citing the position of the Allied and Associated Powers in the ongoing war, Lloyd George said that (in the Report's words) "In this critical situation it was believed that Jewish sympathy or the reverse would make a substantial difference one way or the other to the Allied cause. In particular Jewish sympathy would confirm the support of American Jewry, and would make it more difficult for Germany to reduce her military commitments and improve her economic position on the eastern front." Lloyd George then said
“The Zionist leaders gave us a definite promise that, if the Allies committed themselves to giving facilities for the establishment of a national home for the Jews in Palestine, they would do their best to rally Jewish sentiment and support throughout the world to the Allied cause. They kept their word.”
Regarding the intended future of Palestine, Lloyd George testified:
“The idea was, and this was the interpretation put upon it at the time, that a Jewish State was not to be set up immediately by the Peace Treaty without reference to the wishes of the majority of the inhabitants. On the other hand, it was contemplated that when the time arrived for according representative institutions to Palestine, if the Jews had meanwhile responded to the opportunity afforded them by the idea of a national home and had become a definite majority of the inhabitants, then PaIestine would thus become a Jewish Commonwealth.”
In his Memoirs, published in 1939, Lloyd George further elucidated his position:
"The Balfour Declaration represented the convinced policy of all parties in our country and also in America, but the launching of it in 1917 was due, as I have said, to propagandist reasons... The Zionist Movement was exceptionally strong in Russia and America... It was believed, also, that such a declaration would have a potent influence upon world Jewry outside Russia, and secure for the Entente the aid of Jewish financial interests. In America, their aid in this respect would have a special value when the Allies had almost exhausted the gold and marketable securities available for American purchases. Such were the chief considerations which, in 1917, impelled the British Government towards making a contract with Jewry."
The "Balfour Declaration" was incorporated into the Sèvres peace treaty with the Ottoman Empire and the Mandate for Palestine.
The Doctrine of the Fourteen Points
As the warring armies of Europe neared complete exhaustion, President Woodrow Wilson, in January 1918, enunciated what was called the doctrine of the Fourteen Points. These were 14 statements upon which the world after the war should be constructed. Britain and France, which had done most of the fighting and a great deal of the bleeding, resented Wilson’s proposal. They also resented many of the Fourteen Points themselves.
For instance, one of the Fourteen Points had to do, in effect, with the abolition of colonialism. Even though, idealistically, it sounds like a good idea to end all empires, realistically it was deeply resented by the colonial powers. One of the things that the war was about was the struggle for empire. England was not about to dismantle the British Empire; and neither was France about to give up its colonies.
What they understood by the abolition of colonies was the abolition of German colonies; that those colonies should become British and French (which is what happened). However, what Wilson meant was no colonial empires at all.
Despite opposition, the Fourteen Points struck a responsive chord among the masses in colonial lands worldwide. They suddenly had hopes that they were now going to get their independence. When the post-war world would prove unable and unwilling to grant its wishes revolutions broke out, the repercussions of which are still echoing today.
Another of the Fourteen Points, the one that the Jewish people were most interested in, was a reference to the fact that ethnic minorities would have a right to independence and self-government. The Jews read it as an endorsement of the Balfour Declaration, which promised a Jewish national home in Palestine. Although a less-than-resounding endorsement, this was one of the reasons that Jews were nevertheless strong backers of the Fourteen Points.
Wilson had publicized his Fourteen Points during the war, and the Germans would have been well advised to accept them. However, they did not. They were bringing their army from the eastern front to the western one to mount a last ditch final offensive. After the offensive failed in October 1918, the Kaiser abdicated and the German government that took over sent a message to President Woodrow Wilson that they accepted the Fourteen Points, and wanted an armistice based on them. They intentionally directed their message to Wilson, not the leadership in France and England. Wilson wrote back to Germany that he would propose the matter to the Allies. He did so, but they never answered.
Finally, as the war turned very severely against the German army the Germans proposed an armistice, this time directly to the French. When this armistice came to be on November 11, 1918 written into the agreement was a vague statement that the Fourteen Points would govern the peace treaty that would later be signed. But it was a document subject to many interpretations and it certainly was not binding. However, the German army was in no condition to hold out and demand more than just this vague reference.
The Treaty of Versailles
The Treaty of Versailles of 1919 is the peace treaty created as a result of six months of negotiations at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, which put an official end to World War I between the Allies and Central Powers. The treaty was a follow-up to the armistice signed months before in the forest of Compiègne, which put an end to the fighting.
A meeting was convened in the French palace at Versailles in January 1919 for the 'peace' treaty. However, the Allies met by themselves without Germany present.
The American President, Woodrow Wilson, was "advised" at Versailles Conference by Bernard Baruch; The British Prime Minister, Lloyd George, was "advised" by Alfred Milner, Rothschild employee, and Sir Phillip Sassoon, a direct descendent of Mayer Amschel Rothschild; The French leader, Georges Clemenceau, was "advised" by his Minister for the Interior, Georges Mandel, whose real name was Jeroboam Rothschild; Interestingly all the advisers were Jews mostly representing International Bankers.
Wilson would suffer a stroke while at Versailles, one from which he would never recover. His stroke also had a fateful effect upon world history, because he was not able to campaign for his ideas or impose his will. In the end, the United States withdrew from the matter and entered a period of isolation from Europe. In the retrospect of history, the United States could have made the difference - economically, militarily and diplomatically, in restoring a stable Europe.
Instead the treaty required that Germany claim full responsibility for causing the war, and pay massive war reparations to the allies. Germany also lost territory to many surrounding countries, had its military forces severely limited and was stripped of its overseas and African colonies. Representatives of the new German government, the Weimar Republic, were forced by the victors to sign the treaty, otherwise fighting was threatened to resume. Thus Germany's foreign minister, Hermann Müller, undersigned it on June 28, 1919. The treaty was ratified by the League of Nations on January 10, 1920. In Germany the treaty caused a shock, often referred to as anti-Versailles-complex, which eventually, as designed, contributed to the collapse of the Weimar Republic in 1933, and thus Adolf Hitler's rise to power.
The British Mandate for Palestine
The Treaty of Versailles established the League of Nations, which was the precursor of the United Nations. Basically, it was meant to be a Parliament of all the sovereign nations of the world. They would get together and settle all matters by debate, arbitration, etc. Sounds wonderful in theory but it was always just another tip toe towards a totalitarian world government, with centralized political power, a world army and a world bank.
The British Mandate for Palestine, or simply the Mandate for Palestine, was a legal commission for the administration of the territory that had formerly constituted the Ottoman Empire sanjaks of Nablus, Acre, the Southern portion of the Beirut Vilayet, and the Mutasarrifate of Jerusalem, prior to the Armistice of Mudros. - The Armistice of Mudros ended the hostilities in the Middle Eastern theatre between the Ottoman Empire and the Allies of World War I on 31 October 1918.
The Mandate of Palestine was drafted by Professor Felix Frankfurter, the eminent American Zionist, who later became Chief Adviser to President Roosevelt - He was assisted by the Right Honourable Sir Herbert Samuel, Dr. Jacobson, Dr. Fiewel, Mr. Sacher, Mr. Landman, Mr. Ben Cohen, and Mr. Lucien Wolfe who exercised tremendous influence over David Lloyd George.
The draft of the Mandate was formally confirmed by the Council of the League of Nations on 24 July 1922, supplemented via the 16 September 1922 Transjordan memorandum and then came into effect on 29 September 1923 following the ratification of the Treaty of Lausanne. The mandate ended at midnight on 14 May 1948.
The document was based on the principles contained in Article 22 of the draft Covenant of the League of Nations and the San Remo Resolution of 25 April 1920, by the principal Allied and associated powers after the First World War.
The mandate formalised British rule in the southern part of Ottoman Syria from 1923–1948.
The formal objective of the League of Nations Mandate system was to administer parts of the defunct Ottoman Empire, which had been in control of the Middle East since the 16th century, "until such time as they are able to stand alone." The mandate document formalised the creation of two British protectorates:
- Palestine, to include a national home for the Jewish people, under direct British rule, and
- Transjordan, an Emirate governed semi-autonomously from Britain, under the rule of the Hashemite family.
The State of Rothschild/Israel/Zion
The end of the British Mandate for Palestine was set for midnight on 14 May 1948. That day, David Ben-Gurion, the Executive Head of the Zionist Organization and president of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, declared "the establishment of a Jewish state in Eretz Israel, to be known as the State of Israel," which would start to function from the termination of the mandate.
Upon independence in 1948, the country formally adopted the name "State of Israel" after other proposed historical and religious names including Eretz Israel, Zion, and Judea, were considered and rejected.
Despite opposition from dissenting Jews who believed the ‘Menorah’, the oldest Jewish symbol should be used to decorate their flag; it is instead a blue hexagram, which is not even a Jewish symbol.
It does however make perfectly good sense that the hexagram is used for the Israeli/Zionist flag.
The hexagram is a symbol which geometrically and numerically translates to 666 and it is also used to represent Saturn, the esoteric name given to Satan, it is also of significance to the Rothschild family who now in fact carry the symbol energetically in their own name. Let me try and explain…
In 1743 Mayer Amschel Bauer, the son of Moses Amschel Bauer, a moneylender who famously once stated words to the effect “give me control of a nations money supply and I care not who makes the laws” placed a red sign over the entrance door of his counting house.
This sign was a red hexagram, some say it was a shield, some say shield with a hexagram...
The hexagram is a symbol which geometrically and numerically translates to 666 and it is also used to represent Saturn, the esoteric name given to Satan. The Hexagram was also used in the ancient mystery religions as the symbol of, "Moloch," (described as a demon of unwilling sacrifice), and, "Astaroth," (described as the Lord Treasurer of Hell). The red shield symbol itself can also be linked to an esoteric symbol connected to Egypt as Moloch (Nimrod), the 'god' of sacrifice. So hexagram/shield, or both, it is still fitting and symbolically carries the same meaning. And Incidentally Moloch is the name given to the 40ft burning owl statue that the Rothschilds and prominent world leaders worship at Bohemian Grove where the Bilderberg group meet and discuss world politics between rituals.
Following his father’s death, Bauer returned to Frankfurt to take over his father’s business and it is at this time that he changed his name from Bauer to Rothschild, after the red shield/hexagram hanging over the entrance door – (“Rot,” being German for “Red”, “Schild” being German for “Sign” or “Shield” - it translates to both).
Bribing Harry Truman with $2m for his campaign train helped the Rothschild family ensure Israel was recognized as a sovereign state, Truman was the first to do this, and with the support of the US, others inevitably followed suit.
The people who have suffered the most at the hands of Zionists ironically are the Jewish people themselves. And this is because the Zionists cowardly use the Jewish faith to exploit their own political and financial interests, not that of the Torah.
The Rothschilds have been instrumental in bringing about the eradication of over 6 million of their own when they helped fund Hitler into power in Germany and then despite knowing his plans (more like dictating them) they funded IG Farben, which was the driving force behind the German war effort and concentration camps in WWII.
The Rothschilds practically single handedly armed Germany, while at the same time funded Britain, France and the US.
It is now widely accepted that without the financial efforts of the Rothschilds WWI & WWII could not have happened.
Can you see the hypocrisy?
Tens of Millions of people lost their lives, people of all nations, all religions, all colours - Religion and national identity means nothing to true Zionists, they see themselves as globalists, fighting for their greater cause and everyone else is cannon fodder, even the Jews, in fact look at history, especially the Jews!
Genocide in Palestine
The population of Palestine in 1850 was about 350,000 inhabitants, roughly 85% were Muslims, 11% were Christians and 4% Jews. The non-Jewish Palestinians revolted against the British rule and the sudden influx of Jewish settlers in 1920, 1929, and 1936. By 1948, the population had risen to 1,900,000, of whom 68% were Muslim/Christian, and 32% were Jews. According to Israel's Central Bureau of Statistics, as of May 2006, of Israel's 7 million people, 77% were Jews, just 18.5% Arabs, and 4.3% "others".
“Right now, there is an influx of Soviet Jews into Israel. They are fleeing because they expect religious persecution. Yet at the instant their feet touched Israeli soil, they became extreme Israeli nationalists with no pity for the Palestinians. From persecuted to persecutors in the blinking of an eye.” - Isaac Asimov on Zionism and persecuted Jews turning persecutors
The problem with all of this is, Palestine and its inhabitants were already here and the result of this is mass genocide of the Palestinian people, bought about by the actions of European and Zionist politicians and of course the cold blooded Israeli (Rothschild/Zionist) leaders who justify their bombing of innocent Palestinian schools, homes and civilians by saying they are “defending themselves”! They do say attack is the best form of defence but come on, have you seen Palestine recently? What’s left of it?
"Between ourselves, it must be clear that there is no room for both peoples together in this country. We shall not achieve our goal if the Arabs are in this small country. There is no other way than to get rid of all of them. Not one village, not one tribe should be left." - Joseph Weitz, head of the Jewish Agency's Colonization Department, writting in 1940:
"We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population." - Excerpt from Koenig Report, published in 1976
"We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are resigned to live here as slaves." - Chairman Heilbrun - Committee for the Re-Election of Tel Aviv mayor Shlomo Lahat (1974 - 1993)
"We declare openly that the Arabs have no right to settle on even one centimeter of Eretz Israel... Force is all they do or ever will understand. We shall use the ultimate force until the Palestinians come crawling to us on all fours." - Raphael Eitan IDF Chief of Staff (1978 - 1983)
"We must expel the Arabs and take their place and if we have to use force, to guarantee our own right to settle in those places - then we have force at our disposal." - David Ben Gurion, Israel's first prime minister speaking in 1937
“Our race is the Master Race. We Jews (Mask for Zionists) are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement...
Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves.”
Menachem Begin – Israeli Prime Minister (1977-1983)
Genocide is defined as the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular nation or ethnic group – There is no other word to describe what has happened in Palestine.
Following what is known as the 1948 Palestinian exodus, the 700,000 Palestinians who fled or were driven from their homes were unable to return following the Lausanne Conference of 1949. In the 1948 Arab–Israeli War, Israel captured and incorporated a further 26% of the Mandate territory, Jordan captured the region today known as the West Bank and the Gaza Strip was captured by Egypt. In the course of the Six-Day War in June 1967, Israel captured the rest of Mandate Palestine from Jordan and Egypt, and began a policy of Israeli settlements. The figures are horrifying with over 2 million dead, 7 million refugees, 4.1 million Occupied Palestinians deprived of all human rights listed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and almost 1 million Palestinian children confined without charge or trial to what many have described as Israel's Gaza Concentration Camp for the asserted "crime" of being Indigenous Palestinians living in Palestine.
Given the intimate involvement in the creation and continued funding and support of Israel and its actions does our own government therefore support this?
“In me you have a Prime Minister whose belief in Israel is indestructible. I want to be clear, we will always support Israel”
David Cameron – British PM, 13th December 2010
The answer is unquestionably yes it does.
This is where at least part of your taxes goes, to funding what can only be described as an extremist religious cult.
I’m not talking about Judaism, but I am talking about the political movement of Zionism, which cowardly hides behind the face of an otherwise respectful religion.
Thankfully there are some people who aren’t totally brainwashed and there are Jewish people who do not support Zionism and the genocide in Palestine as well, but anyone who dares say a word against Israel is immediately branded as anti-Semitic, racist or even labeled as an extremist when in fact it is Israel itself that is anti-anything-that-is-not-Pro-Israel, fundamentally racist and extreme to the highest degree.
The West supports and funds Israel because of the Zionist placemen in Parliament and congress who push the Zionist regime forward.
Since 1985 the US has provided nearly 3 billion in grants annually to Israel, with Israel being the largest annual recipient of American aid from 1976 to 2004 and the largest cumulative recipient of aid ($121 billion, not inflation-adjusted) since World War II.
(For more on Western support of Israel see links at the end of the article).
And don’t think Hamas is exempt from corruption either, the politicians on all sides are mere actors, and the world is their stage…
As I Said before there are many Jews who oppose Zionism and its corruption of the Jewish faith, (See links at end of article), rightly so, but how can this possibly still be a minority among Jewish people, the scale of ignorance is hard to swallow when you consider the amount of millions of lives lost to this evil cause already - The bloodshed I’ve been discussing has been ongoing for 100 years now and continues on with almost daily reports of death and killings like echos from the two great wars, in reality can we say that the great wars ever ended? Certainly the killing, the chaos and the genocide did not and sadly it goes on.
“The true Jews remain faithful to Jewish belief and are not contaminated with Zionism. The true Jews are against dispossessing the Arabs of their land and homes. According to the Torah, the land should be returned to them…. The world must know that the Zionists have illegitimately seized the name Israel and have no right to speak in the name of the Jewish people!”
American writer Steven Lendman, a host on the progressive news network got it right when he described what life is like for Palestinians under Israeli (Rothschild/Zionist) occupation.
“Imagine facing these conditions everyday:
- Living in limbo under a foreign occupier. Having no self-determination, no right of return, and no power over your daily life. Being in constant fear, economically strangled, and collectively punished.
- Having your free movement denied by enclosed population centres, closed borders, regular curfews, roadblocks, checkpoints, electric fences and seperation walls. Having your homes regularly demolished and land systematically stolen to build settlements for encroachers in violation of international law prohibiting an occupier from settling its population on conquered land.
- Having your right to essential services denied – to emergency health care, education and employment, and enough food and clean water. Being forced into extreme poverty, having your crops destroyed and being victimized by punitive taxes. Having no right for redress in the occupier’s courts under laws only protecting the occupiers.
- Being regularly targeted by incursions and attacks on the ground and from the air. Being willfully harassed, ethnically cleansed, arrested, incarcerated, tortured and slaughtered on any pretext, including for your right of self-defence.
- Haing no rights on your own land in your own country for over six decades and counting. Villified for being muslims and called terrorists, Jihadists, crazed Arabs and fundamentalist extremists. Victimised by a slow motion genocide to destroy you."
This is Palestine today, where the indigenous people are denied basic human rights such as education, employment and food and the Israelis enjoy the highest standard of living compared to any other State in the Middle East.
Do we just let this happen again? When will we learn? It is allowed to happen because this is the wish of the wealthiest bankers in the world, that’s right, the bankers that almost every nation is in debt to, the Rothschilds and other prominent Zionist bankers. (There’s the answer to a question that’s never asked).
What was that quote we briefly mentioned earlier, “give me control of a nations wealth and I care not who makes the rules” – Mayer Amschel Bauer/Rothschild, it could only be a Rothschild.
These are simply a few links after doing a quick google search, you can find a lot more on the web of course.
Western Support of Israel
Jews Against Zionism