ID2020 - Biometric Identification


Related Articles

Covid-19 Index
Latest News

Is Covid paving the way for Bill Gates and elitist cult members to push digital identities, a global currency, and a surveillance society?

I’m certain by now that we are all familiar with the term ‘Sustainable Development’. This was a phrase that emerged from a United Nations document entitled Agenda 21, and you can guarantee whenever you hear the term it is referencing the elite agenda of imposing a worldwide fascist government and has absolutely nothing to do with sustainability or development.

The UN estimates there are 1.5bn people living without any form of recognised identification and categorises ‘digital identity’ as a defined sustainable development goal. In May 2016, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York, the inaugural ID2020 summit brought together over 400 people to discuss how to achieve this goal.

ID2020 calls itself a non-governmental organisation (NGO) with an interest in providing ‘digital ID’ to all. The program seeks to provide infants with a portable, biometrically linked digital ID either at the point of birth registration or at the time of routine immunisation. It specifically lists ‘driving improvements in vaccination efficiency’ and to ‘increase the number of fully immunised children’ as two of its main goals. (See Source

ID2020s founding partners include, among others, The Rockefeller foundation, Microsoft, and Gavi - The vaccine Alliance. It also partners with many big brands including Facebook and Mastercard. (Source)

Almost 2 years on from the first cases of Covid-19 being discovered we now face the very real possibility that we will be entering a world where vaccination passports are essential to retain basic freedoms. Just about every country has adopted its own (deliberately) flawed version of the ‘covid-pass’, this is merely a steppingstone to adopting a centralised platform which can eventually encompass all financial transactions and personal records. With ID2020 one such organisation already exists, set up by humanities best friend, Bill Gates.

Who is Bill Gates?

Most people believe that Bill Gates made his fortune through Microsoft, however, it is no coincidence that his father, William H Gates Sr, was once head of the Rockefeller-created Planned Parenthood which was part of the Eugenics movement. The Rockefeller foundation still have very close ties with the Gates foundation, because it has always been part of the same cult, and their depopulation agenda is now going full steam ahead.

The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level novel coronavirus pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY. The exercise illustrated areas where public/private partnerships will be necessary during the response to a severe pandemic. (Event 201 website)

  • The Gates Foundation is the largest organisation of its kind in the world with an endowment of about $50bn (£36bn) - more than the GDP of some countries.
  • The Gates foundation is the largest private donor to the World Health Organisation (WHO).
  • The Gates foundation co-hosted and funded Event 201.
  • The Gates foundation funds the World Economic Forum (WEF). The WEF co-hosted Event 201.
  • The Gates Foundation funds the John Hopkins Center with regular grants. The John Hopkins Center compiles the statistical data on the Covid-19 cases and deaths worldwide, it also co-hosted Event 201.
  • Bill Gates founded Microsoft. Microsoft were founding partners of ID2020.
  • The Gates foundation was a founder of GAVI The Vaccine Alliance. GAVI was in attendance at Event 201, was a founding partner of ID2020 and is now a key player in the distribution of Covid-19 vaccines to developing countries. GAVI’s long list of donors include the likes of Google, Mastercard, TikTok and Spotify.

With Covid-19 making its first appearance just 6 weeks after Event 201, unsurprisingly those of us who had been paying attention were somewhat alarmed by the similarities real life events took to the scenarios ‘practiced’ by the 15 global business, government, and public health leaders during the exercise.

Another eerily similar scenario had been presented years earlier published in a Document by the Rockefeller foundation called ‘Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development’.

The scenario, called ‘Lock Step’ describes ‘a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback’. The document can be viewed here, the scenario begins on page 18.

I will quote some excerpts from the document, just remember, this was published in 2010, it is based on a ‘fictional’ future scenario beginning in 2012. This fiction became reality beginning in 2019 with covid.

In 2012 an extremely virulent and deadly pandemic is discovered. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers. The pandemic blanketed the planet. The United States’ initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.

China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of facemasks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.

At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.

If you simply swap 2012 for 2019 the above article perfectly describes the covid pandemic and response that played out in real life. This is not a coincidence.

Nor is it a coincidence that the scenario so accurately describes covid, terrorism, climate change and poverty as the main societal issues. We have the threat of pandemics (covid), transnational terrorism, (Afghanistan and more), environmental crisis (climate change) and rising poverty (self-explanatory and evident).  

The only thing we haven’t yet got is biometric ID, but that’s where Bill Gates funded ID2020 comes in. Although predicted by me and others early in the pandemic that vaccine passports would be our ‘ticket to freedom’, most people shrugged this off and dismissed the idea, even ridiculed it. But it is now evident to all that this is the next step of the plan. On 27 August, the World Health Organization (WHO) published a guideline addressed to member governments on the implementation and technical specifications of digital immunisation certificates, titled “Digital Documentation of COVID-19 Certificates: Vaccination Status: Technical Specification and Implementation Guidelines.”

The effort was funded not from the WHO budget, but by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, and a small handful of other contributors.

Has Biometric Identification already begun?

Dr Robert Young has studied the covid-19 vaccines. Dr Young has been widely recognised as one of the top research and clinical scientists in the World. Throughout his career, his research has been focused at the cellular level. Having a specialty in cellular nutrition, biochemistry and microbiology, Dr. Young has devoted his life to researching the true causes of "disease".

Dr. Young’s studies of the Covid-19 vaccines reveal graphene, aluminium, stainless steel, lipids and parasites are among the ingredients. (Source) 

From Dr Robert Youngs article:

There are currently four major pharmaceutical companies manufacturing the Covid-19 vaccines. The intended purpose of the Covid-19 vaccines are to provide immunity from the so-called infectious novel coronavirus or SARS-CoV - 2 virus now called the SARS-CoV - 19. These four pharmaceutical companies have not provided complete FDA disclosure on their vaccine box, insert fact sheet or label for many of the major and/or minor ingredients contained within these so-called vaccines.

The purpose of this research article is to identify those specific major and minor ingredients contained in the Pfizer Vaccine, the Moderna Vaccine, the Astrazeneca Vaccine and the Janssen Vaccine using various scientific anatomical, physiological and functional testing for each SARS-COV-2-19 vaccine.

Currently, these vaccines are being administered to millions of humans around the World under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) issued by each country without full disclosure of all ingredients and in some cases mandated by governments or employers in violation of individual human rights under the Nuremberg Code of 1947.

Four “vaccines” were analysed which are the Pfizer-BioNtech, Moderna-Lonza mRNA-1273 Vaccine, Vaxzevria by Astrazeneca, Janssen by Johnson & Johnson, using different instrumentation and protocols of preparation according to new nano particulate technological approaches. The different instrumentation includes Optical Microscopy, Bright-Field Microscopy, Phase Contrast Microscopy, Dark-Field Microscopy, UV absorbance and Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy, Transmission Electron Microscopy, Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy, X-ray Diffractometer, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance instruments were used to verify the “vaccines” morphologies and contents. For the high-technology measurements and the care of the investigation, all the controls were activated and reference measurements adopted in order to obtain validated results.

Dr. Young and Dr. Vladimir Zev Zelenko, suggest graphene oxide put into the human body via “vaccination” could interact with satellites or cell towers to deliver information about the subject.

“What I’m suggesting is the inoculation is a guise to literally put in metallic materials, that are potentially magnetic, to interact with satellites or cell towers with the human body,” Dr. Robert Young said.

“In other words, rather than using a cell phone you can use your body and your cell phone for remotely testing, let’s say, blood sugars or blood pressure or oxygen levels.  And this is what the patent actually suggests that Pfizer took out, that was awarded just last month, 31 August of this year.”

“This was the conclusion that I came to: that it is the very first patent that shows up in a list of about 18,500 for the purpose of contact tracing of, I believe, all vaccinated humans worldwide who will be or are now connected to the Internet of Things,” he told Stew Peters in September.

The patent Dr Young mentions is US Patent 11,107,588 B2.

The patent, approved 31 August 2021, reveals technology used to track people to pinpoint those more likely to spread Covid-19 and unvaccinated individuals. The patent was filed by Israeli patent attorneys Dr. Gal Ehrlich and Maier Fenster of Ehrlich & Fenster.

According to the document, “the government may order the citizens to install a dedicated application on their smartphones (or other smart devices like tablets, smartwatches, smart glasses, etc.) to help the government with the logistics of the vaccination procedures.”

Geolocation data will be monitored using cell phones, social media, credit card usage, IP addresses, facial recognition technology found in surveillance cameras, ATMs, and private surveillance cameras in stores, buildings, and houses.

Providing examples of tracking a subject’s behaviour, the patent says it could determine if a person is “wearing a mask” by “analysing images taken during calls” or if a person is “washing his hands” by “analysing sounds of water running or movement by a smartwatch.”

All this is good news if you are Bill Gates and co at ID2020 who say they seek to provide a portable, biometrically linked digital ID at the point of vaccination. For others, like myself, it is what we have long predicted through years of researching these subjects, and it is anything but good news.

Related Articles

Covid-19 Index
Latest News